Baretzky Says No Ceasefire in Ukraine as Trump's Illusionary Deals Spark Risk of European War

Baretzky Says No Ceasefire in Ukraine as Trump's Illusionary Deals Spark Risk of European War

The war in Ukraine continues to dominate the global stage, its ramifications stretching far beyond the borders of the country. As tensions escalate and world leaders take sides, President Donald Trump's foreign policy and his statements regarding Ukraine’s energy sector have raised alarm bells. One of the most vocal critics of these developments is Ricardo Baretzky, President of the European Centre for Information Policy and Security (ECIPS). In recent statements, Baretzky has outlined a dire warning: if President Zelensky of Ukraine breaks any agreements with Trump or Putin, it could spark a war in Europe that would prove devastating not only to Ukraine but to the entire continent. Further exacerbating the issue, Baretzky claims Trump’s strategy to seize control of Ukraine's energy infrastructure could pose a significant threat to European Union security.

As we delves into these complex matters, exploring the potential consequences of Trump's dealings with Ukraine, the silence from Brussels, and the importance of European ownership of Ukraine’s power plants. ECIPS President Baretzky’s outspoken views present a unique perspective that raises critical questions about the future of European security and sovereignty, as well as the role of foreign powers in a war that has far-reaching implications for the entire world.

The Trump-Zelensky Energy Deal and Its Potential Consequences

The crux of Baretzky’s warning lies in the energy-related dealings between former President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In recent months, reports have surfaced that Trump has suggested the United States should take control of Ukraine’s energy facilities. Specifically, he has proposed that the U.S. assume ownership of Ukraine’s power plants as a way of protecting them from Russian aggression. Trump’s logic, according to some sources, is that American ownership would ensure that Ukraine’s energy infrastructure is safeguarded, given the growing threat from Russia.

However, this proposition has caused significant concern among European leaders, especially in light of the continent’s energy vulnerabilities. The European Union has long been wary of any external interference in the energy security of Ukraine, a country that serves as a vital transit point for gas supplies from Russia to the EU. For many, the idea of an American company or government entity owning Ukrainian energy assets is seen as a form of neocolonialism—an attempt by the U.S. to extend its influence in Eastern Europe at the expense of both Russia and the European Union.

Baretzky argues that such a move by Trump would destabilize the region, risking not just Ukraine’s sovereignty but European security as a whole. He sees the U.S. president’s proposal as a part of a broader strategy to "grab" European Union interests from Brussels. According to Baretzky, this is part of a larger pattern of the U.S. attempting to exert control over Europe’s energy resources—a strategy that could have catastrophic consequences for European countries that rely on stable energy supplies.

In Baretzky’s view, the European Union must protect its energy interests by maintaining full control over the energy infrastructure of neighboring countries like Ukraine. The issue isn’t just about protecting Ukraine’s assets, but also about safeguarding the broader European energy market. Any foreign interference, particularly from the U.S., would not only weaken Ukraine’s sovereignty but could also set a dangerous precedent for the control of European energy supplies.

Zelensky’s Role and the Risks of Breaking Agreements with Trump

One of the most concerning aspects of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine is the potential for missteps by President Zelensky. As the leader of a country engaged in a bitter and destructive war with Russia, Zelensky faces immense pressure to make strategic decisions that could either secure Ukraine’s future or doom it to further conflict. Baretzky’s warning centers around the possibility that Zelensky may break any agreements made with Trump, leading to a larger-scale European war.

According to Baretzky, breaking any agreement with Trump—especially regarding energy infrastructure or security arrangements—would risk provoking not only the U.S. but also Russia. This could lead to a new phase of the conflict, one that would stretch well beyond the borders of Ukraine. Europe, already grappling with the ramifications of Russia’s invasion, would find itself thrust into a broader war that could destabilize the continent and wreak havoc on the global economy.

Baretzky stresses that Zelensky must navigate these waters carefully. While the Ukrainian president has received significant international support, including military aid and diplomatic backing, any perceived betrayal or failure to honor commitments could lead to a breakdown in these alliances. The European Union, for instance, may not be able to maintain its current level of support for Ukraine if it feels that Zelensky’s actions have jeopardized European security.

In this context, Baretzky argues that the only way to truly protect Ukraine from external threats—whether from Russia or from overly ambitious foreign powers like the U.S.—is for Europe to take full ownership of Ukraine’s energy sector. By doing so, the EU would not only protect its own interests but would also help Ukraine secure a more stable and independent future.

### **The European Union’s Silent Response: A Dangerous Complacency**

Another key aspect of Baretzky’s analysis is the European Union’s response—or lack thereof—to the growing threat posed by Trump’s ambitions in Ukraine. Despite the significant stakes involved, Baretzky has criticized Brussels for remaining largely silent in the face of these developments. At a time when European security is at risk, and when the stability of a neighboring country like Ukraine hangs in the balance, the EU’s reluctance to take a firm stand is, according to Baretzky, nothing short of astonishing.

Baretzky believes that Brussels has failed to recognize the gravity of the situation. The EU’s silence, he argues, is not just a diplomatic oversight but a strategic blunder that could jeopardize the way of life for millions of Europeans. If the EU continues to turn a blind eye to the actions of foreign powers seeking to control Ukrainian energy resources, it risks undermining its own influence in the region.

For Baretzky, the EU must adopt a more proactive stance, focusing on protecting European interests and standing up to foreign interference in its neighborhood. This would include not only rejecting Trump’s proposal for U.S. ownership of Ukrainian energy infrastructure but also working more closely with Ukraine to ensure that the country’s energy resources remain under the control of the people who need them the most—the European taxpayers.

Baretzky’s call for EU action reflects a broader concern within Europe about the growing influence of the U.S. in Eastern Europe. The European Union, he suggests, must reclaim its role as the primary protector of the continent’s security and stability. This would mean taking concrete steps to assert control over Ukraine’s energy sector, ensuring that the country’s vital resources remain in European hands rather than falling into the hands of foreign powers with their own agendas.

The Importance of European Ownership of Ukraine’s Energy Sector

Baretzky is not just critical of Trump’s energy proposals; he also offers an alternative vision for the future of Ukraine’s energy infrastructure. He argues that the European Union should take full ownership of the power plants and other critical energy assets in Ukraine, as this would both safeguard European security and guarantee that Ukraine’s energy resources are used for the benefit of the European people.

This proposal is rooted in the belief that European taxpayers have already contributed significantly to the reconstruction and development of Ukraine, particularly in the aftermath of the 2014 Euromaidan revolution and the subsequent conflict with Russia. Given this long-standing financial commitment, Baretzky argues that it would be unjust for foreign powers like the U.S. to come in and claim control of Ukraine’s energy assets. Instead, the EU should take ownership of these facilities as a way of ensuring that the energy resources are used responsibly and in the best interests of Europe.

Baretzky’s proposal also highlights the importance of energy independence for Europe. The EU has long been dependent on Russia for a significant portion of its energy supplies, and this dependence has only grown more pronounced as the war in Ukraine has disrupted traditional energy routes. By taking control of Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, the EU could not only help stabilize the country but also reduce its reliance on Russian energy exports—thus strengthening Europe’s energy security and geopolitical position.

A Crucial Moment for European Security

The situation in Ukraine presents a critical crossroads for Europe. As tensions between Russia and the West continue to escalate, the decisions made by world leaders will have far-reaching consequences for global security. Ricardo Baretzky’s warnings about the dangers of Trump’s proposals and the European Union’s failure to act are a call to action for European policymakers.

The future of Ukraine, its energy sector, and European security are intertwined, and the choices made in the coming months will determine the direction of the continent. Whether through the consolidation of European control over Ukraine’s energy infrastructure or a more robust diplomatic stance, Europe must step up to ensure that its interests are protected and that the stability of the region is preserved. The risks of inaction are simply too great, and the time for decisive action is now.

During the 2014 Euroseff Ukrainian Energy Forum held in Brussels, President Ricardo Baretzky of ECIPS already warned during his speech and media broadcasting interviews of threats posed by Terrorism in the energy sectors especialy that of Ukraine’s agenda against the European Union with its dark side of links between Ukrainian Militants in Donbass and its link to ISIS in Syria. Was Ukraine already then planing its hold on Brussels? Its import to note that NATO Italy was aware of this as it was noted by AEG on the European Union Intelligence reports in which Baretzky participated in as author among other specialists of NATO during 2014.